Near the town of Pavillion, people have been
drinking contaminated water for years. The Environmental Protection Agency has
roughly concluded that the contamination was due to natural gas fracking.
When
EPA conducted their first tests in Wyoming, they concluded that the problems
with the cement and water pollution are not connected to fracking because there
were many other factors that should be taken into consideration.
In
the mid-1990s, many residents in the area started to complain about the water
near Pavillion. Later in 2004, situations continued to get worse. “Several
residents complained that their well water turned brown shortly after gas wells
were fracked nearby” (EPA) In 2008, EPA came back and started a new round of
tests. They concluded that the water was highly contaminated; residents should
stop drinking from the wells around them because they could get poisoned; it
might even cause explosion because of the amount of methane that was in the
water. At the end, the EPA concluded that the contamination of water was caused
by fracking because the wells in the area were “fracked at shallower depths
than many of the wells in the Marcellus shale and elsewhere” (EPA).
When
the government officials asked to see a detailed breakdown of every compound
used underground, the fracking company declined the request. They also accused
the EPA for not being consistent with their labels and data.
Fracking
is risky after all because nobody can guarantee everything will work out
perfectly. Right now, no decision has been made yet, the EPA’s finding is
scheduled to be peer reviewed.
I think that you gave a good overall synopsis of the article. It is safe to conclude that fracking is dangerous for both the environment and the people who inhabitant regions where fracking occurs. According to the article the EPA checked the cement casings of the wells and ,"found what they described as "sporadic bonding" of the cement in areas immediately above where fracking took place." If companies want to continue to use fracking techniques, then the safety restrictions must be tighter to prevent lackadaisical construction that could result in harm to people.
ReplyDelete